Evolutionists say that we all came from single celled organisms and eventually became man through the course of many, many evolutionary stages. And that all this transpired in nature without the interference of man or God. Going along hand in hand with this belief, is also the disbelief that God exists, because you can’t believe both. You can not argue that God created everything but not everything was created by God. Either God made everything or we are all pond-scum decedents.
Now today, with all the things that humanity as accomplished in the name of science (not with in-breading, cross breading or DNA manipulation), have we EVER been able to change a single animal in to another.
- Dogs in to cats.
- Birds in to frogs.
- Fish in to monkeys
- Horses in to mice
- No dolphins in to flies
- and no monkeys in to men.
Even when we try to make something new, and it goes against Gods perfect design, it does not work.
Q: What do you get when you cross two animals from the same species? Say Equus of which we have horses and donkeys?
A: A Mule
Q: What do you get when you cross a mule with a mule?
A: Nothing. They are infertile. That is how God made them and part of His design. Now, there have been extremely rare instances where two mules were able to reproduce but the resulting animal was still part of the original parent-species: Equus not something different.
Now in the cases where two animals breed and the resulting animal can breed again, it is because the two were completely compatible in the first place.
Here is where the theory of evolution falls flat.
This complete and highly improbable randomization of chance not only had to happen once, or twice, but over and over again and in the same geographic location. And in a way that the resulting animal was able to reproduce its self.
So Mr. Fish decided one day that “Boy, it sure would be great to be on land and not a fish.” so every day he jumped on the shore a little further and further but never far enough to NOT be able to get back in the water where he could breath. He did this for weeks until the time he went to far on shore and could not get back..
Q: what happened to the Mr. Fish?
A: he died.
Now, evolutionists would have you believe that Mr. Fish not only got used to being out of the water, but somehow was able to move around and eat stuff off of the ground to sustain it’s self. And beyond that, at the EXACT SAME time Mr. Fish was doing this, another fish of the opposite sex was doing the same thing and managed to become a land animal as well. Then, out of all the beaches in all the earth, they happened to met up on the same shore. And when all the conditions were right and they found each other suitable, they mated. Now, since Mr. & Mrs. Fish had only concentrated on being able to live on land, they forgot to bear live young instead of eggs. So they decided to lay them in the water just like that always had.
After the appropriate amount of time, they hatched and and lived out the rest of their lives like normal fish, because that is what they were.
No amount of ‘wishing’ or climatic changes will alter how something reproduces or the reproductive capabilities of the resulting offspring.In this story I proposed that Mr. & Mrs. Fish had the desire to change and above staggering odds, willed it into reality.
Q: Who believes that a fish has the cognitive abilities to not only desire to be ‘more than what I am now’, but also the capacity to make it come to fruition?
A: No one.
Evolution tends to say that change is forced upon a species, causing it to adapt to its new surroundings and situation and over time (usually millions of years) is able to now live comfortably in those different surroundings. With that in mind …
Q: When was the last time you heard of a river drying up and all the fish, or even one fish, decided ‘Well, this sucks. I’m outta here’ and got up and walked down the road to a place that was less sucky?
What a ridiculous concept and utter foolishness. Even a child knows that a story like this is just silly.
Then he goes to school and they teach him ‘Not only is it possible, but it has happened MILLIONS of times, over and over again’ and “It’s because of those the brave Mr. & Mrs. Fish Little Susie, that you are alive today to fail my class.”.
If evolution was truly the way we came in to being, from lower life forms up to man, then why do we still have lower life forms here on earth? Did nature just slap them down and say “Ha! No evolution for you!”
What do we know?
- They were discovered at some point in the 1660’s
- They have multiplied over the face of the earth
- They have and have been mutated by man … and mutated and EVOLVED are NOT the same thing.
- some cause disease
- some are used in antibiotics to fight disease
- some are used in food
- other even they help us digest our food
- They have not evolved.
- They have not sprouted arms and legs.
- They have not grown a brain.
- They have not grown a spine.
- And they CERTAINLY have not become anything OTHER that what God made them: a bacteria.
In Genesis 1:24 we see – “And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.”
All this means (speaking of all the math that came previous in the article) that the chance that any kind of a 200-component integrated functioning organism could be developed by mutation and natural selection just once, anywhere in the world, in all the assumed expanse of geologic time, is less than one chance out of a billion trillion.
Now this is only a 200-part critter. The human machine is comprised of about a dozen major organ-systems that contain hundreds of individual structures whose functions are integrated by the nervous system. We have more than 200 parts in just our bones. We have 206.
Colossians 1:16 – “For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him”
– Brother Hudspeth